E-ISSN 2218-6050 | ISSN 2226-4485
 

Original Article


Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus)

Fernando Carcelen, Melissa Lopez, Felipe San Martin, Miguel Ara, Sandra Bezada, Luis Felipe Ruiz, Rocio Sandoval, Sofia Lopez, Jorge Guevara.


Cited By:1

Abstract
Background: Antibiotics have been used to maintain animal welfare and improve efficiency for more than 50 years. Recently, the presence of antibiotics was found in the muscle, liver, and kidney of guinea pig carcasses for sale for human consumption, which is a public health issue. Probiotics are supplements of live microorganisms that, administered in adequate doses, could replace growth-promoting antibiotics.
Aim: This study analysed the effect of the administration of an oral probiotic mixture on the productive performance of guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus).
Methods: Fifty male guinea pigs, weaned at 14 days of age, were distributed in a completely randomised design of five treatments with 10 repetitions each. The treatments were: CONTROL, without probiotic; PROB 1, 1 mL of probiotic; PROB 2, 2 mL of probiotic; PROB 3, 3 mL of probiotic; and AGP, 300 ppm zinc bacitracin. The microorganisms used in the probiotic were Enterococcus hirae, Lactobacillus reuteri, L. frumenti, L. johnsoni, Streptococcus thoraltensis, and Bacillus pumilus. Productive parameters were evaluated from weaning to 70 days of age.
Results: No statistically significant difference was found between the treatments on forage DMI, concentrate DMI, or total DMI (p>0.05). Similarly, no statistical difference was found between the treatments in terms of final weight or weight gain (p>0.05). Regarding the feed conversion ratio, there was a significant difference between treatments (p=0.045); the CONTROL group had the highest feed conversion ratio, followed by the AGP group, with the best feed conversion ratio observed in the PROB 3 group (p<0.05). In addition, significant statistical differences were found between CONTROL and PROB 2 (p<0.05). Likewise, a significant linear effect of increasing doses of the probiotic was found (p=0.01), which indicated that the feed conversion was better with a higher dose.
Conclusion: The treatments evaluated in this study had a significant impact on the feed conversion ratio in guinea pigs for fattening. Increasing doses of probiotics had a linear effect on feed conversion ratio.

Key words: antibiotic growth promoter, guinea pig, probiotics, productive parameters


 
ARTICLE TOOLS
Abstract
PDF Fulltext
HTML Fulltext
How to cite this articleHow to cite this article
Citation Tools
Related Records
 Articles by Fernando Carcelen
Articles by Melissa Lopez
Articles by Felipe San Martin
Articles by Miguel Ara
Articles by Sandra Bezada
Articles by Luis Felipe Ruiz
Articles by Rocio Sandoval
Articles by Sofia Lopez
Articles by Jorge Guevara
on Google
on Google Scholar


How to Cite this Article
Pubmed Style

FC, Lopez M, Martin FS, Ara M, Bezada S, Ruiz LF, Sandoval R, Lopez S, Guevara J. Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus). Open Vet J. 2021; 11(2): 222-227. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.6


Web Style

FC, Lopez M, Martin FS, Ara M, Bezada S, Ruiz LF, Sandoval R, Lopez S, Guevara J. Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus). https://www.openveterinaryjournal.com/?mno=32984 [Access: March 15, 2024]. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.6


AMA (American Medical Association) Style

FC, Lopez M, Martin FS, Ara M, Bezada S, Ruiz LF, Sandoval R, Lopez S, Guevara J. Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus). Open Vet J. 2021; 11(2): 222-227. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.6



Vancouver/ICMJE Style

FC, Lopez M, Martin FS, Ara M, Bezada S, Ruiz LF, Sandoval R, Lopez S, Guevara J. Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus). Open Vet J. (2021), [cited March 15, 2024]; 11(2): 222-227. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.6



Harvard Style

, F. C., Lopez, . M., Martin, . F. S., Ara, . M., Bezada, . S., Ruiz, . L. F., Sandoval, . R., Lopez, . S. & Guevara, . J. (2021) Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus). Open Vet J, 11 (2), 222-227. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.6



Turabian Style

, Fernando Carcelen, Melissa Lopez, Felipe San Martin, Miguel Ara, Sandra Bezada, Luis Felipe Ruiz, Rocio Sandoval, Sofia Lopez, and Jorge Guevara. 2021. Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus). Open Veterinary Journal, 11 (2), 222-227. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.6



Chicago Style

, Fernando Carcelen, Melissa Lopez, Felipe San Martin, Miguel Ara, Sandra Bezada, Luis Felipe Ruiz, Rocio Sandoval, Sofia Lopez, and Jorge Guevara. "Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus)." Open Veterinary Journal 11 (2021), 222-227. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.6



MLA (The Modern Language Association) Style

, Fernando Carcelen, Melissa Lopez, Felipe San Martin, Miguel Ara, Sandra Bezada, Luis Felipe Ruiz, Rocio Sandoval, Sofia Lopez, and Jorge Guevara. "Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus)." Open Veterinary Journal 11.2 (2021), 222-227. Print. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.6



APA (American Psychological Association) Style

, F. C., Lopez, . M., Martin, . F. S., Ara, . M., Bezada, . S., Ruiz, . L. F., Sandoval, . R., Lopez, . S. & Guevara, . J. (2021) Effect of probiotics administration at different levels on the productive parameters of guinea pigs for fattening (Cavia porcellus). Open Veterinary Journal, 11 (2), 222-227. doi:10.5455/OVJ.2021.v11.i2.6